Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (12) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.12.2014 on the following substantial questions of law: i. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in disposing of the appeal filed by the assessee without independently examining the facts and merely relying upon the order passed by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). ii. Whether the tribunal was justified in law upholding the order of CIT(A). 2. Facts leading to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the assessee is engaged in the business of conversion of rough granite blocks / slabs into polished granite slabs, tiles, monuments, etc. The assessee is 100% export oriented unit having its factory and registered office at Bangalore and exporting its ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... thereupon filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who, by an order dated 30.08.2012 inter alia, held that the assessee has failed to furnish either any evidence or proof with regard to the fact that the payments were made to the foreign parties for the services rendered outside India either in the course of assessment proceedings or before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). It was further held that the terms and conditions of payment are only explained without establishing the fact that the payments have been made by the assessee for services rendered outside India and therefore, the deduction cannot be permitted. In the result, disallowance made by the Assessing Officer to tune of Rs. 39,94,627/- was sustain....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... being afforded even by the Tribunal, the assessee did not file any documents to show that the payments were made for the purpose of business so as to entitle the assessee to claim under Section 37(1) of the Act and therefore, no useful purpose would be served by remitting the matter. 6. We have considered the submissions made on both sides and have perused the record. The relevant extract of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) reads as under:   "... However, the basic fact that the payments were paid to the foreign parties for services rendered outside India was not established with any evidence or proof on record either at the time of assessment or during the course of appeal proceedings.... ....