2020 (11) TMI 941

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the circumstances of tire case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,00,00,000/- on account of share capital and share premium overlooking the fact that the assessee company failed to explain tire reasons for high share premium/capital which was not commensurate with the assets depicted by the assessee company. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition ofRs. 27,88,000/- on account of unsecured loan wherein the assessee company failed to prove the genuineness, creditworthiness and identity of the lender and the additional evidence filed by tire assessee company is not material evidence in support against the said addition. 4. On the facts and in the circumstances of tire case, tire Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting tire addition of Rs. 1,31,27,449/- on account of unexplained investments overlooking the fact that the assessee company made investment in new companies at much higher price than its real worth in the previous and the year under consideration and tire details filed as additional evidence by tire assessee company are incomplete and inadequate. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t, etc. Since, as brought on record by the Ld. CIT(A) there was a clear violation of natural justice by the Assessing Officer, therefore, we hold that Ld. CIT(A) was justified in not only admitting the additional evidence but has also given due opportunity to the Assessing Officer to examine the same. The remissness on the part of the Assessing Officer cannot partake the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, ground no.1 as raised by the Revenue is dismissed. 5. In so far as the addition of Rs. 3 crores on account of share capital and share premium, it has been brought on record before the Assessing Officer as well as before the Ld. CIT (A) that all the share capital and share premium was received in the books in the earlier year and not in this year which was evident from the balance sheet itself:- Particulars Opening Balance as on 01.04.2011 Closing Balance as on 31.03.2012 Authorized share capital Rs. 89,00,000/- Rs. 89,00,000/- Paid Up Share Capital Rs. 88,55,480/- Rs. 88,55,480/- Share Premium Rs. 6,17,05,920/- Rs. 6,17,05,920/- The assessee has specifically submitted before the Assessing Officer that there was no increase in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st March 2011 were amounting to Rs. 60,63,790 out of which an amount of Rs. 25 lakhs pertained to DMC Education Limited and the remaining amount of Rs. 35,63,790 pertained to all other unsecured loans. During the year all other loans were paid back, apart from DMC Education Limited. In this way it was stated that only an amount of Rs. 2,88,000 pertained to the loans received during the relevant assessment year and the only lender is DMC Education Limited. Evidence under Rule 46A, in this regard were filed in the form of ledger account, confirmation, return of income of DMC Education Limited and Bank statement of DMC Education Limited, showing the out flow of cash. The only objection in this regard raised by the Assessing Officer in his remand report was that the PAN of the DMC limited was not provided. However the Ld. AR in his rejoinder to the remand report clarified that the ITR of DMC Limited has been filed as the additional evidence, whereby the PAN number of the same is duly mentioned. With regard to the A.O's contention in the remand report that cash has been deposited before the payment of this amount. I observe that only an amount of Rs. 30,000 in cash has been deposited be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t submitted by the Assessing Officer and the submissions made by the assessee has observed and held as under: "This issue is with regard to investment of Rs. 1,31,27,499 made by the assessee in government and other securities. The Assessing Officer made this addition on account of unsecured investments alleging that the investments have been made from the undisclosed sources of income of the assessee. In the documents filed under rule 46A, the assessee explained that the investment have been made in five companies namely Top Class Enterprises Private Limited, RMR Build Com. Private Limited, Mili and Investment Trade Private Limited, Magnolia Advertise Private Limited, Viz-Wise Commerce Private Limited and K.K. Kabra Mail amounting to Rs. 89,284 and viz-wise Commerce Private Limited amounting to Rs. 47,37,625 made in the earlier years and not in the year under consideration. Confirmed copies of ledger account of these two entities were filed as additional evidences. With regard to the remaining investment, evidences in the form of copy of Form No. 2 pursuant to section 75(1) of the companies Act. In this respect of allotment of share and the copy of Bank statement ....