2020 (11) TMI 662
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r. Rajesh Mahna, Advocate with Mr. Ramanand Roy & D.K. Sharma, Advocates Respondents Through: Mr. Satyakam, Advocate, ASC for GNCTD. JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. : 2. Present writ has been filed challenging the writ of demand dated 29th 3. Petitioner also prays for quashing of the impugned notice of default assessment of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....submission, he relies upon the judgment of this Court in On Quest Merchandising India Vs. Government of NCT, Delhi, W.P.(C) No. 6093/2017. 5. On the last date of hearing, we had asked the petitioner as to why the petitioner had not challenged the assessment orders and notices of default on the basis of which the impugned Writ of demand had been passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner had sta....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....13.03.2019 Third Quarter-2014 2014-2015 5094.35 150082706695 30.11.2018 First Quarter-2014 2014-2015 8415.82 150083259798 14.03.2020 First Quarter-2015 2015-2016 47705.45 150083259828 14.03.2020 Second Quarter-2015 2015-2016 21986.11 150083259873 14.03.2020 Third Quarter-2015 2015-2016 8673.72 150083259914 14.03.2020 Fou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ogin and ward login. 8. Since the demands and penalties are the basis on which the impugned writ of demand dated 29th September, 2020 has been issued, this Court is of the view that petitioner must challenge the demands and penalties in accordance with the statutory mechanism. 9. At this stage, Mr. Rajesh Mahna, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner shall withdraw the pre....
TaxTMI