2020 (11) TMI 249

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ff by the Registrar of Companies, Uttar Pradesh U/s 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016, from the Register of Companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies, Uttar Pradesh. 2. Facts of the appeal are stated as under: i. The Appellant Company Radhey Krishna Hotels Private Limited was originally incorporated on 13.03.2008 with the Registrar of Companies, Uttar Pradesh having CIN U70102UP2008PTC034824. ii. The Appellant Company is involved in business to carry on in India and/or abroad the business and dealers, developers of hotels, resorts and running of hotels, motels, row house cottages, retreats, clubs, restaurants and lodging houses, townshi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome Tax Authorities have not filed their reply as against the appeal. Hence, it is apparent that they have no objection if the Company is restored. 5. Heard the rival sides and perused the record. It is clear by the above stated facts that the Company had fulfilled the relevant statutory compliances with the Registrar of Companies, and the name of the Company was struck off due to the technical reasons. 6. This Tribunal has examined the relevant provision applicable for restoration of the name of the company as provided in Section 252 of the Companies Act 2013 and as per the facts and circumstances of the case, it will be in the interest of the Company, its Shareholders and Creditors, the name of the Company be ordered to be restored by t....