Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 1816

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ms. Vartika Mehra for Shri Sandeep Pathak, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Mohammad Rafiq, ACJ.]. - This writ petition has been preferred by Manoj Kumar Sharma, who is non-resident Indian and presently having residence in Dubai, assailing the order dated 13-4-2018 passed by revisional authority i.e. Government of India, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. 2. The Lear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rma, 2/1203, Sheikh Pura Mohalla, Ward No. 26, Sikar, Rajasthan-332001 whereas the correct address of the petitioner is Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Bhagirath Sharma C/o Dr. Rajesh Sharma Pioneer Hospital Near Tapariya Bagichi Station Road, Sikar (Raj.). It is this address which the petitioner has given in original by the appellate authority in the order dated 24-2-2015 and challenged before the revisi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unsel for the respondent Ms. Vartika Mehra for Mr. Sandeep Pathak submitted that the petitioner was very much aware of the pending revision petition which is evident from the application Anex. 12, dated 11-5-2016 submitted by him to the revisional authority, and therefore, it was his duty to have kept track of the dates of hearing and ensured his presence. It is also argued that the respondents we....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Jaipur dated 23-2-2015 before the same revisional authority. This is substantiated from the notice of hearing received by the communication dated 13-12-2017 received by the petitioner informing that his revision petition has been accepted and listed wherein on the top of the said letter reference number was mentioned. It is always advisable, nay necessary, to decide the cross-appeal/cross-revisio....