Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 1816

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Pathak, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Mohammad Rafiq, ACJ.]. - This writ petition has been preferred by Manoj Kumar Sharma, who is non-resident Indian and presently having residence in Dubai, assailing the order dated 13-4-2018 passed by revisional authority i.e. Government of India, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. 2. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner has confined....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....26, Sikar, Rajasthan-332001 whereas the correct address of the petitioner is Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Bhagirath Sharma C/o Dr. Rajesh Sharma Pioneer Hospital Near Tapariya Bagichi Station Road, Sikar (Raj.). It is this address which the petitioner has given in original by the appellate authority in the order dated 24-2-2015 and challenged before the revisional authority. 3. Learned Counsel ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Sandeep Pathak submitted that the petitioner was very much aware of the pending revision petition which is evident from the application Anex. 12, dated 11-5-2016 submitted by him to the revisional authority, and therefore, it was his duty to have kept track of the dates of hearing and ensured his presence. It is also argued that the respondents were unaware of the revision petition filed by th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....authority. This is substantiated from the notice of hearing received by the communication dated 13-12-2017 received by the petitioner informing that his revision petition has been accepted and listed wherein on the top of the said letter reference number was mentioned. It is always advisable, nay necessary, to decide the cross-appeal/cross-revision together, separately filed against the common ord....