2020 (1) TMI 1303
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....J.Balachander And Mr.S.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner challenges an intimation dated 15.09.2018 in terms of Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, adjusting outstanding demands for assessment year (AY) 2012-2013 of an amount of Rs. 16,50,100/- and assessment year (AY) 2015-2016 of an amount of Rs. 1,65,97,390/-. 2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ided in Rule 17B of the IT Act and it contains the details of amount set apart as claimed by the Appellant.' 4.This finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) to the effect that the adjustment made is beyond the scope of Section 143(1) has become final and the intimation was thus quashed. However, the Appellate Commissioner proceeds thereafter to issue a direction to the Assessing Officer to all....
TaxTMI