2019 (6) TMI 1538

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant Shri Dharmendra Singh, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER: S.K. MOHANTY This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 23.10.2012 passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise & Service Tax, Mumbai. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is an EOU unit, engaged in manufacture of plastic disposable items, falling under Ch....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had applied for de-bonding of the project cover under the said LOP, which was in principle approved by the Development Commissioner vide letter dated 18.02.2005 for withdrawal from EOU Scheme. Subsequently, the appellant vide letter dated 24.03.2005 had approached the Development Commissioner, SEEPZ, for transfer of capital goods to the SEZ unit of M/s Indo Koya Import and Export Company located ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt had failed to achieve positive NFE and duty forgone proportionate to the ratio of unachieved NFE is required to be paid along with interest and penalty. 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. 4. In this case, the appellant had imported the capital goods without payment of duty under bond as per notification dated 31.03.2003. Paragraph 4 in the said notification provides that removal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that such goods are permissible for procurement by these units. The procedure of exit of a manufacturing unit from the EOU Scheme is contained in para 6.18 in the FTP. 5. It is not the case of Revenue that the appellant had not complied with the above provisions laid down in the FTP and the HBP. Since, the capital goods were supplied by the appellant to the SEZ unit, duly approved by the Devel....