2013 (7) TMI 1158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) TMI 1158 - KERALA HIGH COURT - TMI<br>KERALA HIGH COURT - HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 15-7-2013<br>WP(C).No. 15654 of 2013 (F) - -<br>Indian Laws<br>THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. CHITAMBARESH For the Respondent : ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALIDHARAN For the Respondent : ADV. SRI.JAJU BABU, SC, KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, SRI.SAJI VARGHESE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SM....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (ii) Item Nos. 1 and 2 property in Ext.P1 notice situated at Alathur Taluk shall be sold as lot No. II (iii) The item No.3 property in Ext.P3 notice situated at Chevur Village shall be sold as lot No.III. (iv) Item Nos.1 and 2 property in Ext.P3 notice situated at Ernakulam shall be sold as lot No.IV. 3. The first respondent points out that several writ petitions had been fi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Lot No.IV shall be sold if the sale proceeds of lot Nos.I to III are insufficient. It is pointed out that similar course was adopted in Anilkumar v Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. (2013 (2) KLT 944). 5. I permit the petitioners to move a representation before the first respondent within a period of two weeks from today. The representation if so filed shall be considered by the first respondent with....