Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 1823

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es and pesticides, filed its return of income for A.Y. 2009-10 on 30.09.2009 declaring loss of Rs. 1,53,42,442/-. 'Book Losses' under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') was computed at Rs. 7,68,06,987/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act and the case was subsequently taken up for scrutiny. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 22.04.2013 wherein the total income of the assessee as per normal provisions of the Act was determined at Rs. 1,92,65,840/- in view of the following additions/disallowances: - (i) T.P. adjustment under section 92CA(3) Rs. 2,80,96,447/- (ii) Disallowance of deduction under section 35D Rs. 10,77,727/- ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng the disallowance made on account of excess claim of depreciation amounting to Rs. 54,34,110/- without appreciating the fact that the tax auditors in report in Form No. 3CD have also noted that the provisions of Explanation 4A to section 43(1) of the Act are applicable. The learned D.R. was heard in support of this ground and placed strong reliance on the decision of the Assessing Officer (AO) on this issue. 4.2 Per contra, the learned A.R. of the assessee at the very outset drew the attention of the Bench to the orders of the Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case in ITA No. 3077/Mum/2012 dated 25.03.2015 for A.Y. 2007-08 and submitted that an identical issue was considered and decided in favour of the assessee by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er: "31. We have heard the arguments and have perused the details as appended in the APB. The acquisition of the machinery from Bilag is not disputed, it is also not disputed that the machinery is a capital asset and whatever expense is incurred on such outlay, it shall bear the character of capital and added to the cost. Since this is a fact, then applying the ratio laid down by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Ciba of India Ltd. vs CIT, reported in 70 Taxman 505 (Bom), wherein it has been held "... this being so, ... this amount would form part of the cost of the assessment for the purpose of depreciation..." 32. In such a case, the additional depreciation, claimed by the assessee on Bilag machinery is to be allo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ers of the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case in ITA No. 3077/Mum/2012 dated 25.03.2005 for A.Y. 2007-08 and submitted that an identical issue was considered and decided in favour of the assessee by the Coordinate Bench, following the order of the assessee's won case for A.Y. 2006-07 in ITA No., 3078/Mum/2012 dated 28.03.2014. 5.3.1 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record, including the judicial pronouncements cited and placed reliance upon (supra). We find that the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in its order in ITA No. 3077/Mum/2012 dated 25.03.2015 in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2007-08 has decided the identical issue in favour of the assessee whe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 45. We have gone through the submissions made by the assessee and we find that the issue of goodwill stands covered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Smifs Securities Ltd reported in 348 ITR 302, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that intangibles like goodwill are eligible for depreciation. 46. However in so far as non compete fee is concerned, the nature of this payment is now covered u/s 28(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 hence, it would be revenue in nature. 47. We, therefore, direct the AO to allow the depreciation on goodwill as per law and consider the payment of non compete fee, in terms of section 28(va), to consider to allow Rs. 3,05,40,600/- as revenue expenditure." 8. Considering the ....