Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (10) TMI 207

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd 2 and Mr.R.Vijayarajan, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the third respondent. 3. The petitioners, in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, would aver among other things that the landed property comprised in Old Survey No.207/2A and New Survey No.91/2A bearing Patta No.134, Kalikappan II Bit Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District, admeasuring to an extent of 5 acres and 74 cents was originally owned by the father of the first petitioner and he executed a registered settlement deed dated 02.03.1966, in favour of the first petitioner and after the demise of Palaniappa Chettiar, his wife Meenakshi Aachi had adopted the second petitioner as her son by way of adoption deed dated 25.01.1974. 4. The petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....became aware of the fact that the third respondent has registered a case in ECIR No.13 of 2015, dated 31.12.2015 and proceeded with the investigation against Mr.P.K.M.Selvam and Mr.Sankara Narayanan and had passed a provisional order of attachment against the immovable properties which included the landed property of the petitioners measuring 5.74 acres, vide order dated 22.12.2016, bearing No.23/2016, under Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. 7. The petitioners, challenging the provisional order of attachment, preferred a statutory appeal before the first respondent, along with the petition for condonation of delay and connected petitions. 8. The first respondent took the appeal on its file in EPA-PMLA - 3219/CH....