2019 (11) TMI 1441
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (Judicial), Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) AND V.P. Singh Member (Technical) For Appellant: Shri Vardhman Kaushik, Shri Nishant Gautam and Shri Sangkrito Ray Chaudhuri, Advocates For Respondents: None ORDER Heard Counsel for the Appellant. This Appeal is arising from Impugned Order dated 19.09.2019 passed by Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Jaipur) in IA 238....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... claim with the RP who is insisting for first deposit of the value of the trucks already sold. By the Impugned Order, the Adjudicating Authority has directed the Appellant to deposit Rs. 25,10,000/- and then participate. The learned Counsel for the Appellant is submitting that the Appellant did not have knowledge of the initiation of CIRP process and so the fault cannot be found with the Appell....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI