2018 (6) TMI 1715
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Mr. Sham Walve for the respondent. P.C. :­ 1. At the request of the parties, the petition is disposed of finally at the stage of admission. 2. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 16th January, 2018 of the Tribunal rejecting the petitioner's application for rectification of its order dated 25th May, 2017. The application was made under Section 254(2) of the In....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed to the benefit of Section 11(1) of the Act. This according to the petitioner is clearly contrary to and in defiance of the decisions of this Court in Safari Mercantile (P) Ltd. Vs. ITAT, 386 ITR 4 and Gyan Constructions V/s. Income­Tax Appellate Tribunal, [2015] 55 Taxmen.com 479. 5. Mr. Walve, the learned Counsel for the respondent submits to the order of this Court. 6. We find that ....
TaxTMI