1990 (5) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gainst the order of the Senior Subordinate Judge dated August 31, 1989, by which an amendment in the plaint has been allowed but a direction has been issued that the plaintiffs will not be entitled to lead any fresh evidence as the plea taken by way of amendment was for the purpose of elaborating the plea which existed in the plaint. The plaintiff-petitioners, by instituting a suit for declaration....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eed dated March 13, 1973, this suit was filed in the year 1985. Learned counsel for the plaintiff -petitioners has argued that since the amendment was allowed, the right of leading evidence should have been given to the petitioners. After hearing counsel for the parties and after giving my thoughtful consideration to the entire matter, I am of the view that the trial court has acted rightly ....