Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (10) TMI 745

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORAL ORDER   Ms. Sonia Gokani In the present Tax Appeal, revenue has challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot ["Tribunal" for short] dated 26th August 2010, proposing following substantial questions of law for the determination of this Court :­ [A] "Whether in the circumstances and the facts of the case and in law, the Appellate Trib....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... from the record that the Tribunal upheld the order of CIT [A] which in terms held that there was no ground for levying the penalty as is done by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal also was of the opinion that only if there is a wrong claim, or excess claim for deduction is made which is not found sustainable by the authority, that cannot furnish the sole reason for imposing penalty. Here also, t....