2020 (6) TMI 440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ugh: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for R1. Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate for R2. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for GST/R3. O R D E R HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING. 1. The petitioner seeks directions to the respondents/Union of India; Commissioner, CGST, Delhi South; Superintendent of Range a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....adline. 3. Recently, a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 11040/2018 entitled Brand Equity Treaties Limited vs. Union of India has held on 05.05.2020, that the time limit of 90 days prescribed in Rule 117 of the CGST Rules is not mandatory but directory in nature. Further, the respondents have been directed to publicise the said judgment including by uploading it on their website so that a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Central Goods and Service Tax Delhi East. He further states that the respondents have decided to challenge the judgment in Brand Equity Treaties Limited (supra) and are in the process of filing an appeal before the Supreme Court. 7. Admittedly, the judgment in Brand Equity Treaties Limited (supra), has not been stayed so far and therefore, the respondents are under an obligation to abide by th....