1990 (7) TMI 21
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....was correct in law in holding that the division on partition of the properties and assets of the Hindu undivided family took place on March 23, 1972, ignoring the Explanation below section 171 and also the date November 2, 1972, of the award after which the said properties and assets were actually apportioned amongst the coparceners ?" The short question which is involved in this petition is wh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....have the award registered and even an oral partition can take place. In any case, the award had been registered subsequently and as the date of disruption as per the award was stated to be March 23, 1972, that is the date which was accepted. Further appeal to the Tribunal was also made with the same result. It is pertinent to point out that before the Tribunal and, in fact, even before the I....
TaxTMI