Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (8) TMI 1497

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Divakar For The Respondent : None ORDER P.C. 1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 22nd August, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). The impugned order dated 22nd August, 2016 reversed the order dated 21st February, 2013 of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) and granted Registration under Section ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g question no.(i) :- (a) Mr. Kotangle, learned Counsel appearing in support of the appeal states that the impugned order allowed the respondent's appeal by placing reliance upon the decision of its coordinate bench in the case of Geeta Lalwani Foundation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption). Mr. Kotangle, fairly states that the Revenue being aggrieved by the above order of the Tribu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....religious purposes was not in accordance with the objects of the Trust. This led the Director of Income Tax (Exemption) to doubt the genuineness of the Trust and, therefore, rejected the application for registration by order dated 21st February, 2013. (b) Being aggrieved with the order dated 21st February, 2013 of the Director of Income Tax (Exemption), the respondent preferred an appeal ....