2018 (1) TMI 1595
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Arora, Adv. For The Appellant. Sh. R.K. Mishra, DR For The Respondent. (Dr.) Satish Chandra, The present appeal is filed by the assessee-Appellants against the Order-in-Original No. 5/2013(CE) dated 14.02.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I. The period in dispute is 2007-08 to November, 2011. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, during the period ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Department. 4. After hearing both sides and on perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the adjudicating authority has clearly recorded that the total Cenvat Credit in respect of common input services taken by them was not reversed and only an amount of Rs. 80,006/- was reversed by them. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel submits that the entire amount was....