Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1990 (12) TMI 41

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DY C. J. -The Tribunal has stated the following question under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in cancelling the penalty levied under section 271 (1) (c)/274 of the Income-tax Act ?" The assessment year concerned is 1966-67. The assessee is a registered firm dealing in jewellery and al....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Punjab and Haryana High Court in Addl. CIT v. Karnail Singh V. Kaleran [1974] 94 ITR 505, holding that the Explanation appended to section 271 (1) (c) by the Finance Act, 1964, did not supersede the decision of the Supreme Court in Anwar Ali's case [1970] 76 ITR 696. The Tribunal also followed the decision of the Delhi High Court which reiterated the principle in Anwar Ali's case [1970] 76 ITR ....