2016 (11) TMI 1667

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent : Mr. S.Kanmani Annamalai, Spl.G.P., ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the respondent in Sa.Ne.Ko.No.2034/2016-17, dated 12.08.2016 and the consequential proceedings in G.D.R.No.2034/16-17, dated 12.08.2016 and to quash the same. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has paid less tax for the earlier assessment year. Further the goods were not loaded from Rasipuram. The petitioner approached the respondent, by way of representation dated 05.08.2016, ventilating its grievance. However, the respondent refused to accept the representation. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court, by way of this writ petition. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with the impugned notice. 6. This Court is not able to see any merit in the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent. In the instant case, the goods were detained for one reason and the order demanding compounding fee was passed on different grounds, not related to detention and goods in transit. Further, the respondent cannot usurp the jurisdiction of the ....