Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 1300

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ukta Dutta, Mr.Rohan Roy & Ms.Mishika Bajpai, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj, Mr.Abhishek Yadav & Mr.Jatin Teotia, Advs. ORDER 1. The grievance of the petitioners is that while making allocation of Calcined Pet Coke for Aluminium Industry and Raw Pet Coke (RPC) for CPC manufacturing, to be allotted in pursuance of the Public Notice No. 81 dated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1/2019, in WP (C) 13029/1985 inter alia praying for an increase in the annual import limit of RPC beyond 1.4 million MT. This application of the petitioner was rejected by the Supreme Court by its order dated 28.01.2019, observing as under:- "The order dated 09.10.2018 passed by this Court is clear. This court has set the outer limit for import of raw pet coke cannot exceed 1.4 MT per ann....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed capacity as on 09.10.2018. 5. After the filing of the present petition, the petitioner filed an application, being IA No. 73242/2019, before the Supreme Court inter alia praying for permission for the petitioner to challenge the Minutes of Meeting dated 22.04.2019 of the respondent no. 1 regarding allocation. The said application was disposed of by the Supreme Court observing as under:- ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dated 22.04.2019 of the respondent no. 1, also clearly shows that the installed capacity as on 09.10.2018 has to be considered by the respondent no. 1 for making allocation of RPC. The Minutes, however, do not show the consideration of documents that have been referred to hereinabove by the leaned senior counsel for the petitioners, by the respondent no. 1 while making such allocation. 8. In l....