Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1990 (11) TMI 35

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his petition is in respect of the assessment year 1982-83, and the petitioner seeks reference of the following question to this court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee-company was entitled to the deduction of expenses incurred by it in respect of the cinema business at Lucknow which had been closed down ?....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the benefit of deduction was not allowed because, in that case, it had not been held that the two different cinemas involved there formed part of the same business. In the present case, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal, on the evidence on record, have come to the conclusion that the two ventures at Delhi and Lucknow constituted one unit and, therefore, the business....