Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (4) TMI 85

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Commissioner of Income-tax, "the petitioner" for short-urges that questions of law arise out of the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") in I. T. Appeal No. 514(Coch.) of 1982. He seeks an order directing the Tribunal to refer such questions to the Hig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itable purposes. After rejecting the claim for exemption, the Income-tax Officer assessed the income of the respondent at Rs. 54,400. The order of the Income-tax Officer was upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Ernakulam, on April 1, 1982, in Appeal No. 2T/79-80. However, he held that the respondent did not contravene section 13(1) and (2) of the Act. The responde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing to the Tribunal, no referable question arises out of its order under section 254 of the Act. The facts set out in the order of the Tribunal dated May 24, 1985, in I. T. A. No. 514/(Coch.) of 1982 reveal that the validity of the finding of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that the respondent had not complied with section 11 of the Act was called in question. The answer to this question d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wn earlier decision. The fact remains that the petitioner was not permitted to urge the point but the Tribunal "decided" it without allowing the petitioner's counsel to urge it. In CIT v. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. [1961] 42 ITR 589 (SC), it was held, inter alia, that a question of law arises if such question is "raised before the Tribunal though not decided by the Tribunal". It cannot be s....