2016 (2) TMI 1275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....15-2-2016<br>WRIT PETITION No.8376 OF 2016 (T-CST) - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY For the Pititioner : Shri R.V.Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S.V.Giri Kumar, Additional Government Advocate ORDER Heard the learned Advocate Shri R.V. Prasad appearing for the petitioner. The learned Government Advocate is directed to take notice. The pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssued a notice dated 6.8.2011 both under Section 9(2) of the CST Act and under Section 39(1) of the KVAT Act for the assessment periods from April 2007 upto July 2009, making certain proposals under the CST Act, including a proposal to levy tax at a higher rate in respect of turnovers not supported by statutory declarations. Upon receipt of the notice, the petitioner had filed its reply by way ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he second respondent to drop all further proceedings pursuant to the notice dated 7.12.2015. In respect of the periods from August 2009 to March2010, the petitioner had filed an additional reply dated 28.12.2015 to the second respondent to state that due to an accidental fire in the corporate office of the petitioner on 25.04.2015, all the records maintained therein were destroyed, and a reques....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the third respondent as already stated, and an order of re-assessment was passed. Therefore, in spite of the factum of the earlier order of re-assessment having been passed by the first respondent, an order of re-assessment again being passed by the second respondent, is on the face of it illegal and results in a miscarriage of justice apart from prejudicing the interest of the petitioner. 4. ....