Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (4) TMI 192

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e first appellate order dated 5.8.2011 has been upheld. 3. It has been submitted by counsel for the revisionist that the revisionist is a public limited company which has its duly registered office at Resham Bhawan, Mumbai but its principal place of business in the State of U.P. is at Lucknow. He has further submitted that the revisionist-company is registered under U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 as well as Central Sales Act, 1956 w.e.f. 13.2.1987 and 12.3.1987 respectively. The company has a seed processing plant at Kota, Rajasthan. The plant engineers select place, soil etc. for the growing of particular seeds all over India and the company enters into agreements with contractors for procurement of seeds for its Kota plant. The seeds are grown....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the second appeal which has been impugned by the revisionist in the present revision. 7. The following questions of law arise for determination:- "(2) Whether the applicant having appointed various persons as its agent/contractor to provide foundation seeds to the farmers, supervision of its growing and dispatch from U.P. to Kota in the State of Rajasthan, the transaction cannot be treated as purchase within the State of U.P., since the process of purchase was completed in Kota in the State of Rajasthan when the processing and testing of the seeds was complete in Kota and thereafter it was accepted by the applicant company." 8. The impugned order has been assailed primarily on the ground that there is one composite agreement of transac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of U.P. Trade Tax Act. 10. It was further held that second transaction relates to sending of the goods from State of U.P. to Kota which amounts to inter State transfer which is beyond the realm of taxation under U.P. Trade Tax on which no tax has been levied. 11. Sri Rohit Nandan Shukla, learned counsel for the Revenue has supported the orders passed by the authorities below and submits that there is no infirmity with the same and all the grounds raised by the revisionists have been duly considered and entire conspectus of facts has been fairly dealt with. 12. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 13. The assesee is involved in the process of production and certification of seeds. They supply foundation s....