2020 (4) TMI 3
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2006 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>Dr. VINEET KOTHARI AND Mr. R. SURESH KUMAR JJ. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr. R. Swarnavel Government Advocate (Taxes) COMMON ORDER (DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) The Assessee has filed these Writ Petitions aggrieved by the common order passed by the Deputy Commissioner (CT), Chennai on 30th September, 2003 availing the benef....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... as to why their application should not be rejected. The applicants filed their objections on 28.6.2003. The applicants have stated that they are eligible to file an application under the Samadhan Scheme and that the fact that they have paid the entire arrears cannot disqualify them from filing an application under the Samadhan Scheme. They have further stated that the only criteria for f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tertainable under Samadhan Scheme and is therefore rejected." 3.None is appeared on behalf of the Assessee, though on the last occasion M/s.Sri Niranjani, learned counsel had sought adjournment on behalf of M/s.Maliga Srinivasan from the Court. 4.We have heard the learned counsel for the Revenue. 5.Having heard the learned counsel for the Revenue, we are satisfied that there is no error i....
TaxTMI