2019 (10) TMI 1264

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the 'Act'). 2. In this case, the AO passed assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act, determining the total loss of the assessee at Rs. 6,63,85,814/- as against the loss of Rs. 9,27,07,655/-filed by the assessee in its return of income. Subsequently, the Ld. Pr.CIT revised the assessment order passed by the AO exercising the jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, on the ground that in the order u/s 143(3) of the Act the AO has made addition of Rs. 2,40,16,841/- after holding the unsecured loans from four parties as unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the Act, however, while computing tax the AO allowed set off losses against this income u/s 68 in violation of the provisions of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....avjeevan Trade & Commerce (P) Ltd vs. ITO ITA No 575/JP/2018 dated 03.08.2018 to substantiate its claim. 5. On the other hand, the Ld. departmental representative relied on the ooder passed by the Ld Pr. CIT. 6. We have carefully gone through the material on record including the Circular of the CBDT and the decision of the ITAT relied upon by the Ld. counsel. As pointed out by the Ld. counsel for the assesseeThe CBDT has clarified the issue regarding applicability of the provisions under section 115BBE of the Act. Para 4 para of the Circular reads as under: "4. Thus Keeping in the legislstive intent behind amendment in section 115BBE(2) vide the Finance Act, 2016 to remove any ambiguity of interpretation, the Board is of the ....