2014 (1) TMI 1882
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Advocate For M/S King & Partridge For The Respondent. P.C. Mr. Dilip B.Bhosale, At the outset, Mr. T. Suryanarayana, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that even before the appeal, that was filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal bearing ITA No.244/Bang/2005, was decided, the grievance of the appellant-assessee stood redressed and therefore, this appeal has rend....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ch deeming fiction? 2. Having confronted with this, Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing for the revenue does not dispute the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent. Hence, we do not enter into merits of the case and address the questions. 3. The revenue has also raised the following substantial question of law for our consideration which reads thus: Whether ....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI