Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (6) TMI 27

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ncome-tax Act, 1961, the following question of law for the assessment year 1980-81 has been referred to this court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the excise duty liability arises on the basis of the show-cause notices issued by the Central Excise Department and, in that view of the matter, the claim for excise dut....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tta High Court in the case of CIT v. Century Enka Ltd. [1981] 130 ITR 267 clearly applied to the facts of the case. The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to deduction of Rs. 13,781 and Rs. 6,376. However, in respect of the amount of Rs. 1,05,513 and Rs. 78,750, the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the Income-tax Officer with its direction by observing as under: "We have co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is matter to the file of the Income-tax Officer. If he finds that the notices dated March 14, 1979, demanding these two amounts were served on the assessee during April 1, 1979, to March 31, 1980, he should allow deduction, in the assessment year 1980-81, of those two amounts." It is not in dispute that a similar question was considered by Division Bench of this court in the case of CIT v. Cent....