Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1992 (2) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (in short, " the Tribunal "), has referred the following question to this court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the Commissioner of Income-tax was not justified in treating the order of the Income-tax Officer as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al to the interests of the Revenue. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. J. K. Hosiery Factory [1986] 159 ITR 85, and held that two interpretations being possible, the interpretation that is favourable to the assessee was to be adopted. With this conclusion, the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax was set aside. Thereafter, on being moved, this reference has bee....