Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 1725

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the appellant shall provide the Manpower Power for the work of M/s. Agrimass Chemicals Ltd., initially appellant shall pay salary and other expenses to its employees and thereafter they shall receive the reimbursement of salary + other expenses for service, including the service tax payable, from the second party. Accordingly, the appellant registered with the Service Tax Department for services being immovable property, 'Manpower Recruitment Agency Service' provided manpower to M/s. Agrimass Chemicals Ltd. and thereafter they raised a Bill No. 11, dated 23-2-2013 for Rs. 91,63,855/- (inclusive of service tax of Rs. 10,08,057/-). The appellant also deposited service tax amounting to Rs. 10,08,057/- leviable on the said taxable value vide ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nter alia observed that there was no mention of the period of supply of manpower on the invoice for which it was issued as also there was no noting or remark on the bill regarding revision of bill in respect of amount or date. The Adjudicating Authority vide Order-in-Original dated 16th February, 2015 rejected the refund claim, observing that there was no note or remark was made on the bill regarding revision of bill in respect of amount and no date of revision was recorded on the bill. Being aggrieved, the appellant preferred appeal before the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) who vide the impugned order has been pleased to reject the appeal. Further, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) has held that unjust-enrichment was also attracted under ....