Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (2) TMI 774

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ijayaraghavan, Advocate represented on behalf of the Assessee and Mr. M. Srinivasa Rao, CIT-DR represented on behalf of the Revenue. 3. The learned Authorized Representative drew our attention to the additional grounds filed by the assessee which is dated 20.12.2014 but filed on 22.12.2014. In the additional grounds, the assessee has raised the following ground: "Additional Ground: An amount of Rs. 5,76,72,595/- realized to transfer of Carbon Credits - CER (Certified Emission Reductions) was not a receipt in the nature of revenue, but only a capital receipt and therefore not liable to be included in the total income of the appellant for the assessment year, in conformity with the ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Income Tax A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... issue was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication in similar lines. The same was put up to the learned Departmental Representative. Shri. M. Srinivasa Rao, CIT-DR who argued the matter submitted that the issue as to whether the receipts from the sale of carbon credits can be treated as capital receipts or not should not be considered by the Tribunal nor should it be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer. It was a submission that the assessee has not produced any evidence to show as to why the said details were not placed before the Assessing Officer. It was a submission by the learned Departmental Representative that the assessee had in the computation of income filed by the assessee offered the same as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ible. This is because it has been brought to our notice that the decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. My Home Power Limited by the Tribunal has already been upheld by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court by dismissal of the appeal by the Revenue on the ground that there was no substantial question of law. It is also noticed that the decision of the Co-ordinate Cochin Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Apollo Trues Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax has also been upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala by dismissal of the appeal by the assessee , therein on the ground that there was no substantial question of law. It is also brought to our notice that the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court and the Hon'ble ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the learned CIT(A) in confirming the method of computation of the eligible profits done by the Assessing Officer in respect of the steam generated and re-transmitted in respect of the production of the electricity through steam generators, for the purpose of computation of deduction u/s.80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The learned Authorized Representative though submitted a Chartered Engineer's certificate but was unable to substantiate the claim as made the said certificate. The learned Departmental Representative left the court room after the argument on the additional grounds and did not return. In reply, there was no answer from the learned CIT-DR. 8. We have considered the submission and perused the materials available on reco....