2020 (2) TMI 684

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IL G. SHAKKARWAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri Anant Vijay, Advocate for Appellant Shri Anupam Kumar Tiwari, Authorized Representative for Respondent ORDER PER: ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR Heard on miscellaneous application. The miscellaneous application is for taking into consideration the Final Order No.71016-71020/2019 dated 21 May, 2019 for deciding the present appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oth the sides, I take up the present appeal for decision. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant. He has submitted that the goods in question which were seized from the premises on 12 September, 2014 were not marketable and therefore, not manufactured. He has submitted that the seized goods were handed over to him under supurdnama and are still lying with him and the same are of no use....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the said final order that as held by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Parmarth Steel Iron Pvt. Ltd. reported as 2010 (26) E.L.T. 541 (All.) that the statements of such persons who has not been offered for cross-examination cannot be considered as evidence and by applying the ratio of said ruling the evidences on the basis of which learned Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld confiscation....