2016 (7) TMI 1562
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....va, Advocates. For the respondents: Shri Deepak Awasthi, Govt. Advocate. ORDER S.K. Gangele, The petitioner has filed this petition against the order of assessment dated 23/02/2015 Annexure P/5. The petitioner also challenged the order Annexure P/7 dated 02/05/2015. By the aforesaid order application of the petitioner for correction of error has been rejected. 2. The dispute in this....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (II) Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. Dy.Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Corporate Division & others (2015) 27 STJ 273 (Cal) (III) Gail India Ltd Vs. State of M.P. (2014) 24 STJ 690(M.P.) (IV) Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. Vs. State of M.P.and others (2014) 70 VST 40(M.P.) (V) Bright Drug Industries Pvt. Ltd & another Vs. General Manager, DIC Indore and others (2001) 34 V....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the exemption was available to the petitioner vide notification No. 31 dated 31/03/2006. The authority in the impugned order observed that Mandideep unit of the petitioner was eligible to get exemption in accordance with notification dated 23/10/1981 and as per the terms and conditions of the notification dated 31/03/2006 issued after coming into force of Act of 2010, however, Betul unit is not e....


TaxTMI