2019 (11) TMI 1376

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment Advocate ORDER Dr. Vineet Kothari, J. 1. Both the learned counsel submit that the controversy involved in this writ petition is covered by a judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, wherein it has been held by the Co-ordinate Bench that the Entry Tax under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990, is leviable on the imported v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....isted by Mr. B. Raveendran counsel for the petitioner in W.P. No. 33525 of 2007 argued on a slightly different plain. As we can understand from the submissions of the learned counsel that the learned counsel would not seriously contest the levy of entry tax on imported vehicles as there is no submission made on that aspect, but arguments were confined only on the ground that these are fit cases wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le Bench did not agree with the view taken in the case of Sumitomo Corporation, largely on account of the decision of the Division Bench of Kerala High Court in Fr. William Fernandez (supra). On account of the differing view, the matter was referred to the Hon'ble Chief Justice to post the case before the Division Bench. We are informed that the matter is still pending. However, the decision o....