1991 (10) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Petition No. 3545 of 1990 and also rejecting the application-I.A.-II, made by respondents Nos. 5 and 6 in the writ petition praying for modification of the interim order. Brief facts of the case are these : Respondents Nos. 5 and 6 were the owners of a premises situate in Jayanagar in the City of Bangalore. An agreement was entered into between them and the first respondent for the sale of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ication for modifying that interim order on the ground that there was no justification for compelling the appellants to furnish a bank guarantee. That application was rejected. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellants have presented these appeals. Sri Udaya Holla, learned counsel for the appellants, submitted that there was no justification for asking the appellants to furnish bank guarantee....