Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1992 (7) TMI 50

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in our opinion, the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is concluded by the findings of fact. To the income returned by the assessee, two additions, amongst others, were made, one on account of the value of suppressed sales amounting to Rs. 10,96,605 and the other for difference in stock as per....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) deleting the addition in question on account of suppressed sales. In confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), the Tribunal has discussed the matter at length and has found that the additions made by the Income-tax Officer cannot be ....