Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (12) TMI 1194

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Swati Soparkar For the Respondent : Ms. Paurami Sheth. ORDER Akil Kureshi, J. - Assessee has filed this appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') dated 17th September 2010 and further order in Miscellaneous Application passed by the Tribunal on 06th January 2012. The following questions have been presented for our consideration ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y and the cheque receipt at Rs. 7,34,918/- and Rs. 20,78,916/- respectively ? (iv) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in upholding the view of both the lower authority thereby charging interest under Section 139 of Rs. 7,97,324/- and interest under Section 215 of Rs. 54,07,935/- inspite of the facts that there was no men....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in not taking into consideration that action and order u/s 147 were without jurisdiction ? (viii) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in confirming the order of CIT(A) that additions under section 68, 69 and 69A etc are to be made in the year of search if cannot be held that they a....