2012 (12) TMI 1194
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Swati Soparkar For the Respondent : Ms. Paurami Sheth. ORDER Akil Kureshi, J. - Assessee has filed this appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') dated 17th September 2010 and further order in Miscellaneous Application passed by the Tribunal on 06th January 2012. The following questions have been presented for our consideration ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y and the cheque receipt at Rs. 7,34,918/- and Rs. 20,78,916/- respectively ? (iv) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in upholding the view of both the lower authority thereby charging interest under Section 139 of Rs. 7,97,324/- and interest under Section 215 of Rs. 54,07,935/- inspite of the facts that there was no men....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in not taking into consideration that action and order u/s 147 were without jurisdiction ? (viii) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in confirming the order of CIT(A) that additions under section 68, 69 and 69A etc are to be made in the year of search if cannot be held that they a....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI