2020 (1) TMI 132
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondents (Sri. K.V.Arvind, Advocate) ORDER The learned counsel Sri. K.V. Aravind accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is assailing the order dated 15.09.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench, Bengaluru ('ITAT' for short) in ITA.No.386/BANG/2017 as well as the order dated 11.5.2018 and 29.03.2019 passed by the ITAT in Misc.Petition.No.94/BANG/2018 ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ryptic order dismissing the appeal preferred by the petitioner. Being aggrieved, the petitioner had filed Misc. petition for recalling the order dated 15.09.2017 with a delay, which came to be dismissed, pursuant to which another Misc. Petition No.374/BANG/2018 was preferred and the said Misc. petition also came to be dismissed. Hence the present writ petition. 4. The learned counsel for the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Miscellaneous petition. Hence the order passed in Misc. Petition. No.374/BANG/18 rejecting the petition is justifiable. However, the order in Misc. Petition No.94/BANG/2018 requires to be considered by this court in view of the dismissal of the said petition as time barred. 6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, this court is of the considered ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI