Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1989 (8) TMI 7

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... question of law has been referred to this court by the Tribunal under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, any larger dividend than that declared by the assessee-company could reasonably be distributed within the meaning of section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the application of section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the statutory reserve as required to be created under section 205A of the Companies Act was created, even then the company could have distributed a larger percentage of dividend. There were sufficient funds in the hands of the company to create statutory reserves and pay the required percentage of dividends. The Income-tax Officer was also of the same view. The Tribunal, however, has not exam....