1941 (9) TMI 12
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ding upon it. The Courts below passed a decree in favour of the plaintiffs who claimed to be the owners of the land. The defendant was a transferee from the heirs of one Bijai who is said to have been the tenant of the plot. Some evidence was produced by the defendant to prove that there was a condition that the lease of the land should be a permanent one, but the Courts below have disbelieved it.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....two cases of this Court, namely Kanhaiya Lal v. Abdullah AIR 1936 All 385 and Sitara Shajahan Begam v. Munna AIR 1927 All 342 . Neither of these rulings is an authority for the proposition which learned Counsel for the appellant has placed before me. They are cases where if; was found that the source of the defendant's occupation was lost in antiquity and the Courts merely said that in such ci....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI