Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (12) TMI 1174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA For Petitioner: Mr. R.S. Sivaram For Respondents: Mr. R. Aravindan, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to harass the Petitioner in the guise of enquiry either by personal appearance or search warrant or interfering in the day-to-day business of the Petitioner. 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sed to give customs clearance. What was imported is neither a prohibited good nor an unlawful good, but it is only automobile spare parts. The second respondent does not have any say about the price of the goods. In this regard, the second respondent had also conducted an enquiry with the Head of the Office of the Petitioner Company and also with the employees, several times. According to the Peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....9.2019, is furnished. After drawing of the mahazar on the spot, procedure was completed on the same day in the presence of the Inspector of Customs and Superintendent of customs. 5.The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that it is only a procedural act and they are not intentionally harassing the Petitioner and other staffs, as alleged by Petitioner 6.Without going into the facts....