2019 (12) TMI 1067
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... S. SUJATHA J. PETITIONER (BY SRI CHIDANANDA URS B.G., ADV.) RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.M. SHIVAYOGISWAMY, ADV.) O R D E R In this petition, the petitioner has assailed the communication (Annexure - F) dated 24.10.2019, issued by respondent No.2, whereby the application submitted by the petitioner under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS, 2019), has been re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....p with the assessee, the assessee has paid the amounts to certain extent and sought time to make the balance liability. The said communication has not been considered by the respondent No.2, while rejecting the application of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the revenue made an endeavour to justify the order impugned at Annexure-F. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI