2013 (9) TMI 1245

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... - -<br>Income Tax<br>HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. D.V. Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Harshawardhan Prasad, Advocate Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocate F or the Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Narayan, Advocate Mr. A. K. Ojha, Advocate Mr. Brajendra Kumar, Advocate ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Board. The matter at issue is the tax to be deducted at source by the Board. The respondent authorities have recovered a sum of Rs. 11,61,20,158.00 from the Board, being the amount required to be deducted at source from the contractual amount paid to the Corporation. Although the Board has challenged the said order and is pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, it is not in dispute that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....11,61,20,158.00. Petition is contested by the learned counsel Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad appearing for the respondent authorities. He has relied upon the judgments of the Bombay and Kerala High Courts in the matters of Sitaldas K. Motwani v. Director General of Income Tax and Others, ([2010] 323 ITR 223 (Bom)); and of Pala Marketing Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Union of India and Others, ([2009] 3....