Home / 
2019 (12) TMI 838
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....LEADER DR.THUSHARA JAMES JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by a detention of goods that were consigned under cover of Ext.P2 e-way bill and Ext.P1 invoice. A perusal of Ext.P3(a) detention notice and Ext.P3(d) detention order would indicate that the reason for detention was that, while the e-way bill was raised in favour of a consignee who had a GSTIN number, and was a ....