2019 (12) TMI 836

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2019 (12) TMI 836 - KERALA HIGH COURT - TMI<br>KERALA HIGH COURT - HC<br>Dated:- 11-12-2019<br>WP (C). No. 33446 OF 2019 (E) - -<br>GST<br>THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP SRI.P.J.JOE PAUL SRI.MANU SRINATH SRI.RAJAN G. GEORGE FOR THE RESPONDENT : SRI.K.A.ABDUL SALAM R8-9 BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....P24 and P25 assessment orders. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents Nos.8 and 9 and the learned Government Pleader for the official respondents of the State. 3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, I find that Exts.P24 and P25 orders have been passed in terms o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e only alternative for the petitioner is to approach the statutory Appellate Authority through an appeal against Exts.P24 and P25 assessment orders. The challenge in the writ petition against Exts.P24 and P25 orders cannot be maintained in view of the availability of an effective alternate remedy against the assessment orders impugned herein because I find that the assessment orders do not suffer ....