2019 (12) TMI 174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on, the revisionist raised the following question of law for consideration of this Court :- 1. Whether the learned Commercial Tax Tribunal was justified in upholding the seizure of the goods i.e. yarn by the Assistant Commissioner Commercial Taxes, Mobile Squad IV Unit, Lucknow? 2. Whether learned Commercial Taxes Tribunal was justified in not appreciating the content of Memo of Appeal? 3. Whether learned Commercial Taxes Tribunal was justified in not invoking the provisions of law as enunciated under Section 47, Section 48 of the Value Added Tax Act, 2008? 4. Whether the findings recorded by the Commercial Tax Tribunal are in consonance with the material on record? 5. Whether learned Commercial ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... direct dispatch of the goods to Kanpur Party. Thereafter the revisionist issued the Tax Invoice No. 41 dated 14.8.2009 but due to unavoidable circumstances, the goods could not moved out from the factory of UP State Spinning Co. Ltd., Barabanki. As and when the goods were ready as per the purchase order, same was moved on 21.8.2009 and due to inadvertent mistake of UP State Spinning Co. Ltd., Barabanki, the date of bill could not be corrected from 20.8.2009 to 21.8.2009. Therefore, the seizure as well as penalty proceeding are bad and liable to be set aside. 7. Rebutting the aforesaid submissions the learned Standing Counsel submits that the penalty proceeding has rightly been initiated as at the time of interception, Tax Invoice No.....