2019 (12) TMI 172

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent Pleader For the Respondent : Mr.M.Azeem ORDER T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. Heard Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioner and Mr.M.Azeem, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This Tax Case filed by the State is directed against the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (AB), Madurai in M.T.S.A.No.288 of 2008 dated 21.10.2010. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3,63,790/-. Aggrieved by the said assessment, the respondent filed appeals before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirunelveli, who by a common order, dated 12.02.2008 allowed the appeals. Aggrieved by the same, the State / Revenue has filed appeals before the Tribunal, which have been dismissed by the impugned order. 5. The question would be as to whether the activities done by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1956 (in short 'CST Act'). Hence, it was held that the notice calling upon the members of the Kanyakumari District Planters Association to get themselves registered as dealers under the CST Act was without authority and liable to be quashed. The Court after holding so, put a caveat that if a particular planter or agriculturist had carried on business or dealt with rubber in the course of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The raw rubber is sold from the estate by raising estate bills. Apart from the same bill, the transport is also covered by 'Form N1' issued by the Rubber Board and the Village Administrative Officer's certificate to evidence the transport of agricultural produce and in their estate the respondent have sold only their produce and have not engaged in supplying and selling of any other p....