2018 (9) TMI 1919

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, Advocate for respondent ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order dated 06.11.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax, Pune I. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent herein is engaged in the manufacture of parts of elevators, falling under Chapter Head 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the disputed period, the responde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he benefit of refund, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has referred to the contents of the certificate dated 24.11.2016 issued by M/s N.P.S.R & Associates, Chartered Accountants. Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed this appeal, inter alia on the following grounds:- (a) The Commissioner (Appeals) has failed to apprecia....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issioner of Central Excise, Madras v. Addision & Co. - 1997 (20) RLT 479 (Tri.Mad) and also the Circular dated 18.06.1997 issued by CBEC after passing of the order in the case of Addision & Co. 3. Learned D.R. appearing for Revenue reiterates the findings recorded in the original order. He further submits that the respondent had not co-related the facts with supporting documentary evidence that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tant, to prove that the excess amount of duty has in fact been paid by the respondent and such incidence of duty has not been passed on to the customers or any other person. Thus, he prays for allowing the refund claim in favour of the respondent. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records. 5. On perusal of the balance sheet for the year ended 31st March 2017, I find that the amount of refu....