2019 (12) TMI 84
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ers herein seek review of the judgment dated 29.07.2019 in C.A. No. 9800-9801 of 2010 whereby this Court dismissed the appeals preferred by the petitioners against the judgment and order dated 31.05.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.744 of 1994 and the order dated 24.07.2007 in D.B. Civil Review Petition No.80 of 2007; and th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... sq. yard) was on the lower side and the value of the property was much higher than the agreed rate. After the prospective buyers as also the vendors had submitted their replies and after making necessary inquiries and hearing the parties, the appropriate authority passed an order on 30.03.1994 for compulsory purchase of the property in question by the Central Government at an amount equal to the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ew submissions. However, this Court found no reason to accept those submissions while holding that the appropriate authority and the High Court were right in their respective approach, the reasoning and the conclusion. This Court found that a categorical finding was recorded by the appropriate authority that the fair market value of the property in question was 15% more than the apparent considera....
TaxTMI